follow us :
Kurdî
کوردی
فارسی

Trump and the challenges ahead.

creation date 2024 , November 07
0 0

 Donald Trump likes to say that he ends wars, but he now stands to inherit two major conflicts that didn’t exist during his previous term in power: Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Israel's multi-front war in the Middle East. Additionally, there is North Korea with its accelerated nuclear and ballistic missile programs, and China with a possible blockade of Taiwan, a U.S. ally.

It's difficult to predict how Trump would handle these problems in a second term, especially without the cautious and highly experienced generals who were at his side during his first presidency. However, this unpredictability might actually be an advantage, keeping adversaries guessing about his moves. Could this uncertainty push Putin toward a settlement over Ukraine? Might it bring the rogue Kim Jong-un to the negotiating table?

Could it deter Beijing from attempting to seize Taiwan? Could it prompt Iran to rein in its militias to prevent an American-backed Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities?

"Unpredictable" — the hallmark of Trump's first term — seems poised to return. (Frank Gardner, BBC Security Correspondent)

One of Trump's key slogans has always been to pull America out of endless wars. During his presidency, he attempted to reduce America’s military presence in various regions and even arranged agreements for withdrawing U.S. forces from Afghanistan. However, if he were to return to the White House now, he would face two complex crises that did not exist during his presidency. First is the Ukraine-Russia conflict, which escalated into full-scale warfare after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and continues unabated.

Second is the recent rise in Middle Eastern tensions, particularly with Israel’s conflicts against Palestinian groups and the involvement of regional actors, driving the region toward new crises. These challenges, especially in the Middle East, complicate any new policy Trump might pursue to withdraw from wars and reduce military commitments.

To fully analyze this, we need to examine the current situation in Ukraine and the Middle East and consider Trump’s possible approaches to these crises if he were to return to power.

  1. The Ukraine Crisis and Russian Invasion In February 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, sparking a massive humanitarian and security crisis in Europe. Russia’s main goals included reclaiming control over eastern Ukraine, preventing Ukraine’s NATO membership, and expanding its influence in European security. This war forced Europe and the U.S. to respond with severe economic sanctions on Russia and provide military and financial aid to Ukraine. The situation has now reached a point where the conflict not only fails to weaken Russia but also brings substantial economic and security challenges to Europe.
  2. Multi-Front War in the Middle East Recent developments in the Middle East, marked by escalating Israel-Palestine conflicts, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank, have created a complex situation. Meanwhile, regional actors’ support for Palestinian groups has drawn the region into a multi-front conflict that could affect the entire area. Additionally, tensions between Iran and Israel and internal crises in Syria and Iraq make the region ripe for explosion and instability.
  3. . Trump’s First-Term Policies In his first term, Trump adopted an “America First” approach, focusing on reducing foreign military interventions and bolstering the domestic economy. He tried to scale down U.S. commitments by withdrawing troops from Afghanistan and reducing presence in Iraq and Syria. Additionally, he aimed to limit Iran’s regional influence by applying economic pressure and exiting the nuclear deal, without directly engaging in war. Trump also showed interest in improving relations with Russia, although congressional sanctions on Russia prevented full execution of this approach.
  4. Trump’s Potential Approach if Re-Elected If Trump returns to the White House, his approach to the Ukraine crisis and the Middle East conflict might differ significantly from Biden’s: Ukraine Crisis: Trump would likely aim to end the conflict by pursuing a negotiation or settlement with Russia. He might reduce or even stop military and financial aid to Ukraine, focusing instead on achieving a political agreement with Vladimir Putin. However, this approach would likely face domestic and international opposition, as many in Europe and the U.S. believe such a move benefits Russia at Europe’s security expense. Middle East: Rather than direct military involvement, Trump might prioritize putting pressure on Iran and bolstering security partnerships with Israel and Gulf Arab states. He may pursue a similar approach to his previous term, encouraging Arab-Israeli peace agreements (like the Abraham Accords) to establish a regional power balance. Additionally, Trump might use economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure to curb the influence of regional groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.
  5.  Possible Consequences of Trump’s Approach If Trump returns to the White House and follows these policies, it will have widespread consequences for U.S. domestic and international policy: Domestic Implications: Trump might face internal pressure, especially from Congress and parts of the public opposing his approaches. Additionally, reducing military support and aid to Ukraine could lead to significant divisions within the Republican Party. International Implications: Trump’s approach could weaken U.S. alliances, particularly in Europe. Some European countries might feel that America is stepping back from its international responsibilities, prioritizing domestic economic and political interests. In the Middle East, Arab countries might feel more secure due to new peace agreements and a balanced power dynamic with Israel, but at the same time, Iran and its regional allies might pursue more aggressive policies. Ultimately, if Trump returns to the White House, he will likely face unprecedented challenges requiring significant changes to his traditional “pull out of wars” approach. This policy could, rather than enhance global security, increase regional and global tensions.

new comment

please Login to comment