The collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria represents a watershed moment for the Middle East, particularly in its impact on the Kurdish issue. The Kurdish struggle for self-determination and recognition spans multiple nations—Syria, Iraq, Turkey, and Iran—and has been a long-standing source of tension in the region. The downfall of Assad, a critical player in this intricate geopolitical puzzle, presents both challenges and opportunities for resolving the Kurdish issue in a way that could advance regional peace, stability, and economic development.
The Kurdish population in the Middle East, numbering over 50 million, has faced decades of marginalization, denial of rights, and systemic oppression. Kurdish people have long fought for autonomy and recognition under the framework of international law, specifically the principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter and other instruments recognizing the right of peoples to self-determination.
In Syria, the Kurdish-led Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its military wing, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), have asserted control over the autonomous region of Rojava, a model of governance built on principles of democracy, equality, and ethnic inclusion. The fall of Assad could bring new uncertainties, but it also creates an opening for addressing the Kurdish question comprehensively in line with international norms.
Resolving the Kurdish issue is critical for fostering peace and stability in the Middle East. Kurdish struggles for recognition and rights, though often met with hostility, are rooted in legitimate aspirations for dignity and justice. Addressing these aspirations can lead to a more inclusive and peaceful regional order.
A durable solution to the Kurdish issue would bring numerous benefits for peace and stability:
Kurdish regions, despite being rich in natural resources such as oil, gas, and fertile lands, have often been economically marginalized. Recognizing Kurdish autonomy and investing in development could unlock immense economic potential, benefiting both the Kurdish people and the wider region.
The Kurdish struggle for self-determination aligns with the principles of international law, particularly those enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the UN Charter. Kurdish groups in Syria, Iraq, Turkey, and Iran have consistently advocated for their rights through both political engagement and grassroots movements. Their demands are not aimed at destabilizing states but at achieving recognition and rights within a framework that respects sovereignty and diversity.
By framing the Kurdish struggle within this legal and moral context, regional powers can move beyond outdated narratives of opposition and work toward solutions that recognize the legitimate aspirations of the Kurdish people.
The relationship between the Kurds and Israel is strategically significant for both parties. Israel has historically supported Kurdish aspirations for autonomy and self-determination, seeing this as a way to weaken several regional adversaries and secure a reliable ally in a hostile environment[1]. For the Kurds, Israel's support provides a valuable diplomatic and potentially military ally in their quest for recognition and autonomy.
The fall of Assad presents a rare opportunity for meaningful progress on the Kurdish issue. To seize this moment, regional powers and the international community must:
The fall of the Assad regime could serve as a turning point for the Kurdish struggle for recognition, providing an opportunity to address longstanding grievances and build a foundation for lasting peace and stability. Recognizing Kurdish rights and integrating their aspirations into broader regional governance structures would not only transform the lives of millions of Kurds but also create a model for coexistence and cooperation in the Middle East.
Solving the Kurdish issue through peaceful and just means would reaffirm the region’s commitment to international law, human rights, and democratic principles. It is a critical step toward a future where the Middle East is defined not by conflict and division but by mutual respect, economic growth, and shared prosperity.